Long-Runout Landslides: the Effect of Lithology on Comminution, (Micro-)Structures, Morphology, and Runout

  Landslide Copyright: LIH

Contact

Name

Anja Dufresne

Senior Scientist

Phone

work
+49 241 80 96779

Email

E-Mail
 

Long-runout landslides

Funding: DFG

Program: Long-Runout Landslides: the Effect of Lithology on Comminution, (Micro-)Structures, Morphology, and Runout

Project term:  2013-2018

 

For the past 130 years, scientists have been trying to understand the processes that allow large rock avalanches to cover exceptionally long runout distances. One approach is to study their deposits for clues to their movement history—much progress has been made in describing their morphology and sedimentology. The challenge is to provide data that can be used to infer the processes acting during runout, and thereby ground-truth existing emplacement hypotheses. To achieve these, we developed a new sampling protocol. We designed it specifically for the analyses of grain size distributions, which can be used to infer breakage processes. This method is based on detailed facies mapping and the sampling of material from each individual facies—as opposed to bulk sampling, which destroys the signals contained in material constituting each facies. What we found is that the facies we identified are present throughout the entire deposit length and depth, suggesting that all processes act within the full deposit and during the entire runout duration. Comparing the facies’ grain size distributions with those produced under controlled conditions in the laboratory by previous studies from other colleagues, we identified breakage along existing planes of weakness, fragmentation that creates new grain surfaces, and shear concentration in narrow bands as the dominant processes acting at increasing stresses during runout. All this indicates heterogeneous stress distribution throughout emplacement, and rules out any exotic emplacement hypothesis, supporting only those that are in agreement with heterogeneous stress distribution in the moving rock avalanche mass.

Publications:

  • Dufresne A, Geertesma M (in press). Rock slide – debris avalanches: flow transformation and hummock formation, examples from British Columbia. Landslides
  • Kraus W, Reicherter K, Urai JL (2019). Sample-bonding. Der Präparator 64: 6-20.
  • Dufresne A (2017). Rock avalanche sedimentology – recent progress. In: Mikos M, Tiwari B, Yin Y, Sassa K (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides 2(1): 117-122.
  • Dufresne A, Dunning S (2017). Process-dependence of grain size distributions in rock avalanche deposits. Landslides 14(5): 1555-1563.
  • Dufresne A, Bösmeier A, Prager C (2016). Rock avalanche sedimentology – case study and review. Earth-Science Reviews 163: 234-259.
  • Dufresne A, Prager C, Bösmeier A (2016). Insights into rock avalanche emplacement processes from detailed morpho-lithological studies of the Tschirgant deposit (Tyrol, Austria). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 41(5): 587-602.
  • Dufresne A (2014). An overview of rock avalanche-substrate interactions. In: Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y (eds). Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment – Volume 1, Springer Verlag: 345-349.
  • Dufresne A, Prager C, Clague JJ (2014). Complex interactions of rock avalanche emplacement with fluvial sediments: field structures at the Tschirgant deposit, Austria. In: Lollino G, Giordan D, Crosta GB, Corominas J, Azzam R, Wasowski J, Sciarra N (eds). Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Volume 2, Springer Verlag: 1707-1711.